• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Donate

The Arts Fuse

Boston's Online Arts Magazine: Dance, Film, Literature, Music, Theater, and more

  • Podcasts
  • Coming Attractions
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Commentary
  • The Arts
    • Performing Arts
      • Dance
      • Music
      • Theater
    • Other
      • Books
      • Film
      • Food
      • Television
      • Visual Arts
You are here: Home / Film / Thank You for Lying About Smoking

Thank You for Lying About Smoking

April 3, 2006 Leave a Comment

Full disclosure: my mother died of lung cancer, brought on by a decades-long addiction to the product satirized in the new film “Thank You for Smoking,” directed by Jason Reitman (son of Ivan Reitman) from a novel by Christopher Buckley (son of William F. Buckley). So maybe I’m not the right person to be reviewing this movie.

By Thomas Garvey

On the other hand, maybe I’m precisely the right person to be reviewing this movie. After all, if it can make me laugh, it can make anybody laugh.

Well, I didn’t laugh much – although I did admire Christopher Buckley’s cool analysis of the central conceit of conservative politics: in a word, the co-optation of policy debate by indignant appeals to a floridly puritanical and pseudo-masculine idea of “freedom.” Marketing death in Buckley’s world is made to seem like the Berlin Airlift, or the right of the accused to free counsel – the American Way, it seems, requires that people be offered the temptation to become addicted to nicotine and kill themselves. These points have been made before, but Americans seem immune to self-knowledge on this score, and Buckley knows every trick of this particular trade (after all, he learned it at the feet of his father, its master). And much like his own father, director Reitman knows just how to pitch Buckley’s jokes (although he basically loses track of his plot), and Aaron Eckhart, with a jock-star jaw so phallic he really should wear a condom on it, is the perfect mouthpiece for the cocky, clever dialogue.

Aaron Eckhart in “Thank You for Smoking.”

Only there’s a specter haunting “Thank You for Smoking” – the specter of its own dishonesty. For it seems that Christopher Buckley has borrowed a page or two from the very playbook he’s pretending to critique: he, too, fashions his script as a kind of forum on free choice, and elides the fact that, in the end, cigarette smoking is about drug addiction, pure and simple.

Try to imagine “Thank You for Smoking Crack,” and you immediately perceive Buckley’s central problem: it’s hard to write witty banter about drug addicts, especially ones who can’t breathe. So the author only glancingly treats the subject of nicotine (by most accounts more addictive than heroin) and the industry’s manipulation of it. I counted only one quick reference to “addiction” in the movie, and no mentions of nicotine at all – and tellingly, while we hear over and over that Eckhart’s character, Nick Naylor, smokes cigarettes, we never actually see him light up, and he seems to withdraw from his habit with no trouble whatsoever. (This is particularly dishonest given the movie’s satire of “product placement” for cigarettes in movies – it seems Reitman, et. al., have succumbed to exactly the opposite syndrome!)

Of course the silence about nicotine addiction is necessary to keep aloft the idea that “Thank You for Smoking” is a witty moral soufflé that “doesn’t take sides” because “there are no easy answers” (which also allows for all kinds of snickers about the self-righteousness of Big Tobacco’s opponents). In fact, treating smokers as what they are – addicts – would drop-kick the idea of free will right out of the equation (and would render meaningless such “ironies” as the movie’s equation of cigarette smoke with the cholesterol in cheese). Indeed, including such inconvenient facts would require the film to portray Big Tobacco – and its cheerleaders at the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere – as essentially pimps for a gigantic drug culture (which is precisely what they are), and in short order, a large portion of the conservative self-image would quickly collapse. Indeed, Big Tobacco lost ground steadily under the Clinton administration because of precisely what this movie leaves out; from “Thank You for Smoking” you’d never guess why a slow political consensus coalesced that not only were smokers victims of addiction, but the rest of us were, too (via second-hand smoke).

So is it too much to ask a movie to play by moral rules other than those it ridicules? Perhaps. But somehow I don’t think my mother would have thought so, and I’m pretty sure there’s a really biting satire to be made about this particular biting satire.

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share

By: Arts Fuse Editor Filed Under: Film Tagged: Film, jason-reitman, smoking, thank-you-for-smoking

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Popular Posts

  • Television Review: “Surviving Death” — Probing Death and The Great Beyond Surviving Death's balance between personal experiences... posted on January 11, 2021
  • Jazz Album Review: “El Arte del Bolero” — Passionate Homage to the Era of the Bolero So Miguel Zenón, who on saxophone has the facility of a... posted on January 5, 2021
  • Arts Feature: Best Movies (With Some Disappointments) of 2020 Our demanding critics choose the best films (along with... posted on December 21, 2020
  • Arts Feature: Best Classical Recordings of 2020 The pandemic may have largely shut down live musical pe... posted on December 22, 2020
  • Film/Music Review: The Best Music Documentaries of 2020 — With Some Disppointments Some of the best music documentaries of 2020 - and some... posted on December 29, 2020

Social

Follow us:

Follow the Conversation

  • Tom Augaitis January 15, 2021 at 10:23 pm on Blues Album Review: John Hurlbut and Jorma Kaukonen’s “The River Flows”What a great recording from two masterful artists. Hoping for a sequel.
  • Anthony January 15, 2021 at 7:08 pm on Classical CD Reviews: A Banquet of Beethoven from Daniel Lozakovich, Midori, and Gidon Kremer & FriendsI went ahead and listened to both but I could not finish listening to Midori's, had to stop. Lozakovich's was...
  • Bill Marx, Editor of The Arts Fuse January 15, 2021 at 11:44 am on Film Review: “Pieces of a Woman” — “They give birth astride of a grave…”The quotation in the review's headline is part of a line in Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot: "They give...
  • erica abeel January 14, 2021 at 3:31 pm on Film Review: “Let Them All Talk” — Angst of Many FlavorsI'm most grateful to be read by such responsive readers as you guys!
  • Luca Schlichte January 14, 2021 at 8:25 am on Television Review: “Surviving Death” — Probing Death and The Great BeyondPerhaps they'll explore that in another season. :)

Footer

  • About Us
  • Advertising/Underwriting
  • Syndication
  • Media Resources
  • Editors and Contributors

We Are

Boston’s online arts magazine since 2007. Powered by 70+ experts and writers.

Follow Us

Monthly Archives

Categories

"Use the point of your pen, not the feather." -- Jonathan Swift

Copyright © 2021 · The Arts Fuse - All Rights Reserved · Website by Stephanie Franz