Arts Commentary: Time to Step Off the “Carousel” of Denial
By Bill Marx
We desperately need plays and musicals — produced by local companies with courage and nerve — that acknowledge that the cancer of autocracy is here, today, and becoming stronger. That is the demand — will any in the arts community answer the call?

L.-r.: Carousel Stage Director Anne Bogart; Boston Foundation President (and “the Starkeeper/Dr. Selden” in Carousel) Lee M. Pelton; Colonial Theatre General Director Joey Riddle; City of Boston Mayor’s Office of Arts and Culture Interim Director Kenny Mascary; BLO Music Director and Carousel conductor David Angus (seated); ArtsBoston Executive Director Catherine Peterson; BLO Artistic Director Nina Yoshida Nelsen; BLO General Director and CEO Bradley Vernatter. Photo: courtesy BLO
Is there a farce — on stage or screen — that explores the following premise? The world is systematically falling apart and, in the middle of the conflagration, sits people carrying on as usual, ignoring the carnage going on around them. They go about their daily lives as others are kidnapped by masked police, misinformation dominates public discussion, education on all levels is trashed, nature malfunctions, and the government puts the kibosh on freedom of speech, movement, and the potential to instigate change.
Passivity this extreme can be found in some silent film comedies. Buster Keaton or Charlie Chaplin greet violent disasters with deadpan acceptance, though they battle like hell not to drown in the tidal waves of turmoil. Master dramatists, such as Samuel Beckett and Eugene Ionesco, come closest to nailing a state of unnatural indifference in the face of catastrophe. In terms of film, there’s Joe E. Brown’s Osgood Fielding III at the end of Some Like it Hot, serenely batting away all objections, no matter how crippling, to what he desires – a comfortable life on his yacht with his love.
Boston’s arts community — particularly its theater and performing arts companies — appears to be oblivious to the stark realities crowding in around us, producing a real-life version of what could charitably be described as the farce of denial. A sampling of the critical issues being overlooked: the Trump administration’s determined (and increasingly successful) undermining of democracy and voting rights, free speech, science research, the independent judiciary, and a functioning government. And there is more. Due process is being kicked to the curb, the U.S. Constitution cast aside, and the economy sunk. Recently, MAGA-driven policies hit home in the Boston-area when Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish national Tufts Graduate student, was “disappeared” by ICE and shanghaied from campus to Louisiana, the latter action defying a court order decreeing that Öztürk be kept in the state. The student’s apparent offense: she co-authored an op-ed in the school newspaper, The Tufts Daily, sympathetic to the Palestinians. Predictably, our theaters have not dared to touch the Israeli/Palestinian dilemma, though there is plenty of drama to be had. For example, probing the duplicitous behavior of universities, which have repressed the student-led pro-Palestine and anti-war movement, and the allegations of antisemitism weaponized by Trump’s administration in its attacks on higher education.
Regarding Israel, and all the other issues mentioned above, our stages have been mum. They are kowtowing, like Columbia University and a few giant D.C. law firms, to the oppressive moves of the powers-that-be. Should our theaters step aside during an American crisis? Should they be handed a pass — as ‘just entertainment’ — and turn their ears away from the reactionary buzzsaw? They do so at their peril. Rather than stage dramas or musicals of bold provocation, productions that decry an encroaching dictatorship, our stages are content to blow bubbles of theatrical escapism. Granted, fascists and their followers enjoy ‘a good night out’, so Boston-area box offices may not suffer during a regime of censorship regulated by the actions of a police state. But the price will be the end of artistic freedom, along with the diminishment of human dignity.
As our democracy teeters, why have our stage companies decided to hide? They could bring in challenging political theater productions and companies, even for a night or two, perhaps for a staged reading. Theatrical rebels exist: I challenge our stages to move away from what, over the past decades, has become safe, consumer-friendly programming, the candy-assed land of Jersey Boys or Cats. Instead of acknowledging an existential crisis in governance (let alone facing it), our major theaters are supplying diversions for the upper crust, like Nassim, or staging musical comedies, such as Hello Dolly! at the Lyric Stage or Two Strangers (Carry a Cake Across New York) at the American Repertory Theater. Is that really what our theaters should be doing? By proceeding as if everything is normal, they are greasing Trump’s authoritarian wheels with song and dance.
Boston Lyric Opera’s recent PR celebration of its upcoming staging of Carousel added insult to injury. At the Emerson Colonial Theatre, “municipal, community and cultural leaders in Boston [came] together to mark a milestone moment in the American musical theater — and the city’s role in making it happen. Eighty years ago on March 27, the now-iconic Rodgers & Hammerstein musical opened its pre-Broadway tryout at Boston’s Colonial Theater. The 1945 run galvanized Boston’s reputation as a great ‘tryout town’ for plays and musicals headed to New York. The event ends with a community singalong of “You’ll Never Walk Alone,” the musical’s timeless and timely anthem of resilience and community support.”
“You’ll Never Walk Alone”? Community support? Timeless and timely? In what privileged world is BLO and Boston’s movers and shakers living? Eight decades have passed since that anthem assured war-weary, God-fearing Americans all would be well. We are now in a time of fragmentation and state-sanctioned, court-cancelling mass deportation. (According to ICE, 370 illegal aliens in Massachusetts have been rounded up so far. Who stands by their side?) Who is this “you” that won’t be stepping out alone? The immigrants, students, and protesters currently being “disappeared” out of the country (some into maximum security prisons) without due process? (As of this writing, the mealy-mouthed Tufts University admin is not accompanying Öztürk through the wind and rain.) Is this “you” those who are battling the illiberal upheaval — the accelerating demolition of our politics, the slicing and dicing of our government? Or is this “you” the rich, the powerful, and the well-connected — shoulder-to-shoulder with audience members who can afford the show’s $67 to $85 ticket? Perhaps it is the oligarchs, like Elon Musk, who have “hope in their heart”? After all, Trump is promising “a golden sky” after America makes it through the “storm” of tariffs. (Note: “You’ll Never Walk Alone” is plastered in the BLO’s ads for the show.)
Many of those “vanished” by Trump & Company are facing their trials alone. Our theaters might consider recognizing this grim state of affairs by taking on shows that ask us to empathize with those that are being isolated. If our performing arts companies really wanted to support their neighbors — beyond the usual marketing hoo-ha — they might put a spotlight on the deep fear running through Boston-area neighborhoods, using the stage, as it has been in the past, to inspire collective action and dissent. Instead, we have our cultural poobahs paying nostalgic homage to an era of Boston’s theatrical history that is gone, baby, gone. Unless you count the try-outs of Diane “Broadway or Bust” Paulus at the well-heeled, strategically silent American Repertory Theater.
Let’s face facts: Carousel opened in Boston the year America helped defeat fascism in Europe. We desperately need plays and musicals — produced by companies with courage and nerve — that acknowledge that the cancer of autocracy is in this country, today, and becoming stronger. That is the demand — will any in the arts community heed the call?
Bill Marx is the editor-in-chief of The Arts Fuse. For over four decades, he has written about arts and culture for print, broadcast, and online. He has regularly reviewed theater for National Public Radio Station WBUR and The Boston Globe. He created and edited WBUR Online Arts, a cultural webzine that in 2004 won an Online Journalism Award for Specialty Journalism. In 2007 he created The Arts Fuse, an online magazine dedicated to covering arts and culture in Boston and throughout New England.
Tagged: "Carousel", antifascism, authoritarianism, Boston-Lyric-Opera, Culture, Democracy
Nobody can figure out how to react to the daily onslaughts on democracy. I don’t know why local theater has been singled out. Maybe the answer for theater isn’t some play done for 100 liberals in the South End who already agree with everything. How about a call for a return to ’60s and ’70s guerrilla theater, bring plays of protest into the public arena? One note: the recent production of My Dinner With Andre by the Harbor Theater included a speech by Andre offering a harrowing political take on life today, obviously America under siege, which was in the original screenplay but cut out of the film.
Bosh! People are beginning to figure out how to deal with the daily onslaughts on democracy — giant law firms are banding to together, protests are growing larger around the country, some of our politicians are beginning to respond (finally) with the alacrity that is called for. Why should local theater be singled out? Why not? Our stages tell us (ad nauseam) that they are part of the community … and we just had a Tufts Graduate student ‘disappeared.” The arts (including local stages) should standby and entertain while an anti-Constitutional project is fulfilled? If you care about the future of the imagination you will want the performing arts to join in the battle for the future, for their future.
Ironically, you answer you own question — there is a rich tradition of theater that meets the political moment, from street theater to documentary plays, examples of which I have written about in earlier columns. Glad that My Dinner With Andre contains a prescient speech, but I want to see what stage artists today (young, old) think about the rise of authoritarianism. Enough re-cycling …if the withering of democracy, free speech, and due process can’t inspire dramatists, then theater is lost. If only producers would give theater makers of dissent a chance. But they are afraid … somebody might protest!
Also, a note that Wallace Shawn has written a number of ‘political’ plays. None of his works for stage have been produced in the Boston area — at least from what I can tell — for decades (aside from Dinner With Andre). 2018’s Evening at the Talk House, according to Lucas Spiro’s Arts Fuse review of a production for radio, is “a savage indictment of our country’s acceptance of the immense, horrific violence necessary to maintain our consumer comforts.”
Bosh continued …. Just heard that 50 University/College presidents are getting together to talk about strategies to fight Trump this weekend. How about Boston’s theaters — large and small — getting together and plotting about what they can do, together, to protect artistic freedom, etc?
Excited by both premises here– the idea of live guerrilla theater and a more overtly politically engaged theater both sound like urgently needed responses to these terrifying times.
To the extent that art can push back against the march of totalitarianism (which I think is a sadly, tragically, frustratingly limited extent) it should do so to the utmost with taste, humor, nuance, and moral power. Human dignity demands nothing less.
I think when you’re talking about art vs. totalitarianism the key issue is the size of the audience. The more people can hear you, the more effective you’re going to be.
Music tends to be the most effective form of resistance– you can have a thousand people singing the same song at the same place at the same time, being actively physically engaged by it, rather than sitting quietly in a dark theatre.
So maybe it’s not live theatre, which will usually be limited by the number of people in the seats, that will be the most effective way to speak out. Whatever can be broadcast live or recorded and then shown on online platforms like Netflix or Hulu or whatever is the way to get in front of The People.
That’s where the eyeballs are these days. So that’s where the political impact would be.
One Boston theater company that deserves applause and support is the Theater Offensive, which is part of an ACLU lawsuit against the NEA’s new anti-LGBTQ funding criteria. We are now seeing the divide between the arts organizations that have resistance in their DNA and the ones that are now running away from the move for diversity and inclusion that they embraced just a few years ago.
Bravo Theater Offensive! And yes, we have many ‘liberal’ stage companies, including the majors, who once trumpeted their love of diversity and inclusion (and dedication to community) hiding away because the going is tough (and will get tougher).