Cultural Commentary: On the National Arts

By Jonathan Blumhofer

There’s nothing benign about what just happened on the banks of the Potomac. 

“If art is to nourish the roots of our culture, society must set the artist free to follow his vision wherever it takes him. We must never forget that art is not a form of propaganda; it is a form of truth…In a free society art is not a weapon and it does not belong to the spheres of polemic and ideology. Artists are not engineers of the soul. It may be different elsewhere. But democratic society—in it, the highest duty of the writer, the composer, the artist is to remain true to himself and to let the chips fall where they may.”

— President John F. Kennedy at Amherst College, 26 October 1963

“How crazy is it to think that we’re going to celebrate Christ at Christmas with a big traditional production, to celebrate what we are all celebrating in the world during Christmastime, which is the birth of Christ?”

— Kennedy Center interim president Richard Grenell at CPAC, 22 February 2025

The Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — unsettling business is afoot.

Given everything else happening these days, one could be forgiven for overlooking the recent goings-on at Washington, D. C.’s Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. In case you missed it, earlier this month, Donald Trump fired eighteen of the institution’s board members; dismissed its widely admired president, Deborah Rutter; installed fourteen of his cronies; named himself the chairman of its board; and elevated his lackey Richard Grenell to run the place in the interim.

Considering how much unsettling business is afoot, Trump’s seizure of the Kennedy Center necessarily ranks lower on the scale of national horrors. The destructive antics of an unelected, chainsaw-wielding South African billionaire; control of the nation’s health care system being handed to an anti-vaccination, conspiracy theory-embracing crackpot; and the dismissal of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on account of his skin color ought to worry and offend us more.

Yet there’s nothing benign about what just happened on the banks of the Potomac. Indeed, the president’s move makes history of the most nefarious kind: for the first time, the federal government has hijacked what is supposed to be the nation’s premiere arts institution in an effort to explicitly censor voices and viewpoints it deems undesirable.

If that sounds like a page out of Stalin’s playbook, that’s because it is. And easy though it might be to look away or laugh off Trump’s action, that would be a mistake: nothing about it is reassuring.

Again, we have a demonstration of an individual with immense powers who’s simply out of control. Forget disregarding norms and pushing boundaries. Trump is doing what he can because he can, not because it’s the right thing to do, not because he’s qualified, not because it makes any logical sense, not because it’s in anyone’s best interest. By another name, this behavior is an abuse of power, one that’s consistent with an ideology of “might makes right” that, as it follows its natural course, is overtaking national institutions like a cancer.

Trump lackey Richard Grenell will to run the Kennedy Center for the time being. Photo: WIki Common

Coupled with this is the administration’s war on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Thus far, this assault on “wokeness” is their most pernicious and wickedly ingenious. The definition is slippery, but that’s the point: like “communist,” “socialist,” or “Red” of an earlier era, it’s a catchy epithet that counts.

Naturally, the arts are Ground Zero for the next offensive in this battle. The field’s openness to all comers and, often enough, its embrace of MAGA world’s outcasts—people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, and political liberals—makes it an easy target. So, too, is its relative economic fragility: threaten its public funding, the thinking goes, and everyone will fall into line.

The administration has already started doing the last, rolling out new guidelines for grants from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) that require compliance with their anti-DEI and anti-trans initiatives. Such noxious doings are, of course, their prerogative—like it or not, that’s the platform Trump ran and was elected on. Nevertheless, historical examples of governments forcefully injecting themselves into the arts rarely ends well, either for compliant artists or nations.

That the Kennedy Center finds itself in the eye of the storm is both fitting and tragic. When Congress passed the National Cultural Center Act of 1958 it was at the height of the Cold War; the the idea that the United States should challenge Soviet artistic excellence followed as a matter of course. Though, geopolitically, those years were often harrowing, American arts and sciences thrived.

Though the national temper was jaded and more skeptical by the time the building was completed in 1971, the Kennedy Center has, by and large, admirably fulfilled its mission to serve as a beacon for the national arts, weathering the whims of whatever party was in control of the White House or Congress. In fact, the decentralized nature of American culture helped ensure that its work flourished thanks, mainly, to private support. Especially given this fact, the breadth of the Center’s offerings—music of all kinds, theater, film, sculpture, photography, and educational programs among them—has been remarkably catholic and remains unique on these shores.

Now, though, all of that is under threat.

Grenell, whose glaring unfitness for his position makes him an ideal cog in the machine of sophomoric incompetence that is the Trump Administration, has thoughts on what should be in — Jesus, the J6 Prison Choir (yes, a collective of singing, pardoned felons) — and out: the Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington. One can only imagine what next year’s sestercentennial will look like. No doubt triumphalist and partial, as these things usually are, though perhaps tinged with more than the usual edge of White Christian Nationalist malice?

What a far cry from Opening Night in ’71, when Leonard Bernstein’s Mass, a self-titled “theater piece” for singers, players, dancers, symphony orchestra, blues combo, rock band, and then some, wove all (or nearly all) of the day’s irreconcilable contradictions—of race, gender, faith, unbelief, protest, conformity, and more—into a messy whole. Perfect? Hardly. But Mass stands as a considerably fairer representation of the polyglot nation we inhabit and a far more honest effort to address its real problems than the current regime is either capable of admitting or willing to attempt.

What, then, can be done?

A few things, even if, in the near term, Trump remains president and Congress keeps behaving like his supine lapdog. As Norman Ornstein has pointed out, there are legal means at the Kennedy Center’s disposal to potentially overturn what’s just occurred.

A scene from the Boston Conservatory production of Leonard Bernstein’s Mass. Photo: Eric Antoniou.

Whether or not that happens, the future of the symbolic home of the nation’s arts remains murky. Will the National Symphony Orchestra and Washington National Opera remain in residence? If they leave, where do they go? Will touring artists avoid the venue? Several, including Issa Rae, Rhiannon Giddens, and Renée Fleming, have already cut their ties with the Center. What about its diverse offerings of hip-hop, country, folk, theater, comedy? How will they be curtailed?

That all remains to be seen though, to be sure, there’s no shortage of right-leaning performers—not to mention choirs of pardoned criminals—who might fill open dates. Either way, the situation hardly says anything encouraging about the larger state of our nation, either artistically or morally.

The good news, however, is that we needn’t settle for it. At the very least, the Trump Administration’s assault on the arts and free expression should be a call to action, for audiences just as much as artists.

How to proceed? Well, first, remember Benjamin Franklin: “A great empire, like a cake,” the Boston native once quipped, “is most easily diminished at the edges.”

Accordingly, stay alert. We should know by now that the time to resist unacceptable impulses and actions is early on. Desiring to wait out events or for things to calm down is natural, but to dally six, twelve, or eighteen months—let alone years—makes the eventual effort to rise up that much more difficult.

In the coming months, audiences will need to speak anew with their feet and their wallets. Engage with the arts. Support artists and institutions that share your values and advocate for the causes you believe in. Buy tickets and attend performances. If certain groups aren’t doing as much as you think they should, make your voice heard. Don’t forget that there is a direct relationship between the arts and the general public that should never be discounted—by either side. Also, donate: small groups and big ones need support.

The latter will no doubt have some difficult decisions to make. They’ll either need to develop new sources of funding or tailor their offerings to fit the strictures of the NEA’s Trump-friendly grant guidelines—if that is department isn’t axed entirely. The easy choice may well be to go small and keep quiet. But this is a moment that calls for so much more. History is littered with examples of artistic and moral cowardice. Don’t let this be one of them: if today isn’t the day for institutions to stand up for something right and good, then that day is never coming.

Individual artists and smaller groups are, often, more versatile and creatively nimble. Now is the time to redouble support for them.

Official White House photo of President John F. Kennedy . Photo: Wiki Common

Make no mistake, come what may, the arts will endure. They are, at their truest, a reflection of our shared humanity and don’t care a whit for the caprices of petty tyrants or anti-diversity initiatives. Just as Beaumarchais and Verdi worked their way around 18th– and 19th-century censors and Pasternak and Shostakovich navigated the far more treacherous waters of Soviet cultural practice, 21st-century American artists now have their moment. It may not be the one we wanted, but it’s the one we’ve got. Let’s make the most of it.

Along the way, recall JFK. His 62-year-old speech at Amherst isn’t the sort of oratory one will be hearing from the White House anytime soon, but its content, which gives surprising and humane voice to Nietzsche’s injunction that “art is the proper task of life,” rings as potently now as ever.

“The artist,” Kennedy observed on that long-ago October evening, “however faithful to his personal vision of reality, becomes the last champion of the individual mind and sensibility against an intrusive society and an officious state. The great artist is thus a solitary figure. He has, as Frost said, a lover’s quarrel with the world. In pursuing his perceptions of reality, he must often sail against the currents of his time. This is not a popular role…

“If sometimes our great artists have been the most critical of our society, it is because their sensitivity and their concern for justice, which must motivate any true artist, makes him aware that our Nation falls short of its highest potential. I see little of more importance to the future of our country and our civilization than full recognition of the place of the artist.

“In serving his vision of the truth, the artist best serves his nation. And the nation which disdains the mission of art invites the fate of Robert Frost’s hired man, the fate of having ‘nothing to look backward to with pride, and nothing to look forward to with hope’.”


Jonathan Blumhofer is a composer and violist who has been active in the greater Boston area since 2004. His music has received numerous awards and been performed by various ensembles, including the American Composers Orchestra, Kiev Philharmonic, Camerata Chicago, Xanthos Ensemble, and Juventas New Music Group. Since receiving his doctorate from Boston University in 2010, Jon has taught at Clark University, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and online for the University of Phoenix, in addition to writing music criticism for the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

7 Comments

  1. Franklin on March 5, 2025 at 8:02 am

    The Kennedy Center had gotten in the habit of hosting drag brunches at its rooftop restaurant. It put on a Drag Salute to Divas event at its Millennium stage, and a production of a drag solo show called Dixie’s Tupperware Party. They also held a “Dragtastic Dress-up” aimed at children and teenagers. Did anyone on this reputedly widely-respected Kennedy Center board ask aloud, “You know, half the country hates us and thinks we’re grooming children for sexual exploitation with their tax dollars when we host programming like this. Do you think maybe we should leave this kind of thing to smaller companies that aren’t direct beneficiaries of federal payments?” If so, the answer was evidently “Those people don’t matter.” Now those people do matter, and cultural elites have treated them with such disdain for so long that their mood is revanchist. They’re cheering for that guy with the chainsaw.

    So long as progressives view themselves as the moral and intellectual center of the cosmos, and their not being in control of the governing machinery as a threat to all that is good within it, they will remain blind to their own autocratic tendencies and their inclination to demonize people whom they need to form a broad arts-supporting public. In the meantime, patriotism is one of art’s few remaining taboos, and it has been amusing to watch progressives react to it with all the revulsion with which they assume (largely incorrectly) that conservatives react to homosexuals and non-whites. “Trump lackey” Richard Grenell is gay; did you disdain to mention that because it would injure your portrayal of the Trump administration as troglodytes?

  2. Bill Marx, Editor The Arts Fuse on March 5, 2025 at 9:25 am

    My two cents.

    Half of America (I would like to see the polling on that) is upset by a couple of drag shows at the Kennedy Center? Evidence that the elites are “grooming children for sexual exploitation with their tax dollars when we [the Kennedy Center] hosts [drag shows].” This is all fear and hysteria generated and exploited by conservatives (or anarchists whose idea of the law is the chainsaw) for the sake of what looks like an agenda of untrammeled greed, control, and censorship. More attention should be paid to how the economic elites (right and left) are undercutting the well-being workers of all political beliefs. It is an old story — divide and conquer.

    I await Trump to make good on his promise of a “Golden Age” of American culture. I would point out that the Kennedy Center in 2022 hosted the 50th Anniversary production of Jesus Christ Superstar. Surely the angels sanctified public funding on that occasion.

    I believe philistines exist all along the ideological/gender spectrum …

    As a critic, believe me, I would welcome an opportunity to evaluate good, patriotic art — Christian musicals, bring them on! Unleash Ben-Hur! Revamp Godspell!During WWII Broadway was filled with rousing homages to America: the new honchos at the Kennedy Center could look there for programming ideas.

    But why not take inspiration from the tip top? When asked about his favorite book, Trump’s response was interesting — the pacifist classic All Quiet on the Western Front. On the eve of war with — Greenland, Panama, Canada — that would be a stage production worth seeing. Perhaps the conservative’s favorite Jewish philanthropist, George Soros, could bankroll a production at the Kennedy Center in an act of patriotic fervor? Would not the entire country cheer?

    • Franklin on March 5, 2025 at 11:24 am

      Trump’s “Kamala is for they/them” ad became one of the most successful campaigns in the history of contemporary elections because it captured broad frustration with the progressive obsession with avant-garde sexuality at the expense of more substantive issues. Those frustrations help explain Trump’s strengthened support among Latinos, Asians, and even blacks in the last election. And true to progressive form, you’re claiming that they aren’t real. Is “half of America… upset by a couple of drag shows at the Kennedy Center?” I doubt it. Is half of America tired of being treated like idiots by their vaunted progressive betters? Are they unimpressed with the idea of funding their cultural disenfranchisement? Evidently. You’ve been opining lately about how the arts might respond to the 2024 election. Frankly, the most radical thing they could do right now is humanize the people experiencing those frustrations. That would entail artistic courage that doubling down on the usual progressive concerns doesn’t require.

      • Bill Marx, Editor The Arts Fuse on March 5, 2025 at 11:35 am

        A successful ad proves that half the country loves or hates anything? This is a corporate ad/political advisor class talking point. People voted for Trump for a number of different reasons. I am not saying the votes are not real — or that some people don’t feel that way. But half the country — bosh! Prove it with evidence, not ideological fantasies.

        What cultural disenfranchisement? There is plenty around — I would say far too much — homogenized entertainment/culture. Watch Fox or any of the other mainstream channels all day without skepticism. You will get just what makes you comfortable… a narrow view of the world that keeps you in line. Garbage in, garbage out.

        We do agree on one thing — we need to humanize everyone in the discussion, all sides. I am afraid, emboldened by Trump, conservatives are working overtime on generating fear. Not that the left doesn’t do it as well …

        • Franklin on March 5, 2025 at 2:32 pm

          The taxpayers didn’t fund Fox. Courtesy USAID, they funded Politico, The New York Times, Reuters, the AP, and the BBC for some reason, but not Fox. I’m not watching Fox anyway and I doubt you are either. Maybe their programming is all garbage, and the Kennedy Center inviting children to crossdress at “Dragtastic Dress-up” is not as revolting as it sounds. But the Kennedy Center crowd can opt out of underwriting Fox viewers. The converse is not the case.

          My contention is that 49.9% of voters in the last presidential contest preferred Trump’s vision of leadership to Harris’s, who garnered 47.6% of the popular vote. Harris’s team credited the “they/them” ad to a 2.7% move in Trump’s favor, making it decisive.

          https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/kamala-harris-trans-gender-democrat-election-campaign-kvzqz9d6c

          In June 2024, when the not at all cognitively impaired (so we were told, by USAID-funded outlets) Biden was still running, Pew cited stark differences between Republicans and Democrats on culture war issues. We’re not talking about one ad, we’re talking about broad sentiment that made that ad salient.

          https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/06/cultural-issues-and-the-2024-election/

          So I stand by the claim that my hypothetical poobah at the Kennedy Center should have asked the question I put in his mouth, and one of his fellow poobahs should have answered, “Yeah, maybe we should phase out this kind of thing so that we don’t get chopped to pieces if Trump gets into office.” But they didn’t, and the Chainsaw of Consequences has arrived freshly oiled. Your demanding proof of this or that is pettifogging. There is a well-founded and well-deserved cultural backlash underway. I don’t expect the forthcoming patriotic programming attached to the administration to be any more or less cringe than “Dixie’s Tupperware Party.” But I also don’t regard the shift from the latter to the former as fascism or Stalinism or whatever hysterics people are attaching to it.

          • Bill Marx, Editor The Arts Fuse on March 5, 2025 at 3:48 pm

            Your first point is quaint. We have two libertarian billionaires who own major media outlets exploiting the government for contracts, tax breaks, etc to build rockets to the Moon, Mars, etc. One is currently head of an agency that is slashing the IRS — which will no doubt be helpful when it comes to playing fast and loose with tax returns. And so many watchdogs have been fired. Given the state of things in the world, it would behoove people who are concerned about drag shows to complain vociferously about other issues, such as the waves of corruption to come.

            But sure, if USAID is funding media it shouldn’t, then remove the funding. I have no problem with that. The issue is that the meat-cleaver approach you favor is haphazard and brutal. For example HIV treatment monies are not going to South Africa — that means people will die. And the money has already been allotted — if you want to stop future payments, go to. But must the meat cleaver hack through human flesh? End cancer research? The cruelty, as they say, is the point.

            No doubt the new crew at the Kennedy Center will be sufficiently self-censoring. What will be the new “drag show” cultural tripwire? They will have to stay alert.

            As for the public being revved up about the culture war issues, that is partly what the shock-a-rama diets of Fox, MSNBC, and social media are all about. Be upset about drag shows rather than about … well, there is so much more to be concerned about (Climate Crisis, anyone?), though our President tells us a ‘golden age’ is just around the corner. Don’t worry, be happy.

            I love the word “pettifogging,” but I do not want to live in an evidence-free zone, though it does make life a lot easier — no pesky counter arguments with inconvenient facts and independent voices. Granted, that is the impenetrable mindset of our current President, who hasn’t much use for proof or accuracy. As a drama critic, I like hearing articulate views from both sides in plays — dramatized human perspectives, not talking points.

            Concerning the cultural “backlash”, that “Chainsaw of Consequences”, I say bring it on, as long as no blood is shed. It may, I hope, stimulate something creative and fresh. I have seen more than enough well-meaning liberal plays about empowerment. A drama about intrepid conservatives unlocking a conspiracy to groom kids in a grammar school would at least be different.

            What I would really like is something that speaks to what is going on now that presents both sides with strength and humanity. Given the nature of what I have heard so far from our new cultural poohbahs, I am not optimistic, but you never know.

            Also, as I have written, an underground theater may flourish…nothing like censorship and repression (armed with a chainsaw) to get the artistic juices flowing…

            Regarding news that the Trump admin is stepping away from opposing book banning:
            “If you want to control people, you interfere with their access to information,” Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the Office for Intellectual Freedom at the American Library Association (ALA), told Axios.

  3. Steve on March 6, 2025 at 2:53 pm

    So many weirdos who get triggered by drag shows and obsess over their own hang-ups with gender and sexuality while staying quiet about climate change, income inequality, unaffordable health care and the very real sexual abuse committed by right-wing politicians and religious figures! In the coming years, children are infinitely more likely to be harmed by the rise of diseases that should be prevented with vaccination than drag queens.

Leave a Comment





Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Categories

Archives