• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Donate

The Arts Fuse

Boston's Online Arts Magazine: Dance, Film, Literature, Music, Theater, and more

  • Coming Attractions
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Commentary
  • The Arts
    • Performing Arts
      • Dance
      • Music
      • Theater
    • Other
      • Books
      • Film
      • Food
      • Television
      • Visual Arts
You are here: Home / Books / Movie Nation

Movie Nation

January 5, 2005 Leave a Comment

Critic David Thomson says the movies have profoundly shaped America, and not always for the better.

“The Whole Equation: A History of Hollywood” by David Thomson. (Knopf)

By Tim Riley

The title of David Thomson’s provocative new history of film comes from a trenchant passage in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel “The Last Tycoon”: “You can take Hollywood for granted…, or you can dismiss it with the contempt we reserve for what we don’t understand. It can be understood too, but only dimly and in flashes. Not a half a dozen men have ever been able to keep the whole equation of pictures in their heads.” Fitzgerald’s insight echoes throughout Thomson’s sweeping narrative, whose details reinforce those ominous words.

Best known as the author of the epic “Biographical Dictionary of Film,” Thomson chronicles the rise and fall of Hollywood icons past and present in “The Whole Equation.” The lineup includes Charlie Chaplin, D.W. Griffith, and Louis B. Mayer as well as Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas. His first illustration of how writers (producers, directors, celebrities) don’t get the “whole equation” focuses one of Hollywood’s most respected figures: Robert Towne, who wrote “Chinatown,” and battled famously over its ending with director Roman Polanski.

For Thomson, “Chinatown” provides a neat metaphor for the compromises and entanglements of Hollywood: “‘Chinatown’ is not only tragic and foreboding, not just a parable about the ways in which Los Angeles has relied on exploitation, power, rape, greed, and a sense of the future, but a subtle magical metaphor for Hollywood and filmmaking in which the lone seeker of truth is told to shut up at the end, to go along with being left alive and (probably) paid off, and accept that the system, the business — “they” — are always going to survive and endure and run the show.”

In other words, “Hollywood” is a place where Towne regrets how the death of Noah Cross’s daughter/lover Evelyn Mulwray strays from his original plot (here’s one writer who argued in vain for his “happy” ending). “Chinatown” won Towne’s screenplay an Oscar, but he didn’t make his fortune until writing the “Mission: Impossible” film series starring Tom Cruise in the1990s. Such is the agonizing “sense” that Thomson teases out of the furious battle between aesthetics and showmanship, authorship and ownership, the image and who controls it.

At 400 pages, Thomson’s book is both efficient and thorough. After “Chinatown” he leaps back over a hundred years to the early inventions which defined the movies, their purpose and context. Around 1895, the French brothers Louis and Auguste Lumi? invented their cin?tographe, the ancestor to modern “cin?.” At the same time, Thomas Edison was building something called a kinetescope in New Jersey, a small screen an individual looked through to watch moving pictures.

Thomson lingers here for an interesting insight: imagine how different the last century might have been had Edison’s more private kinetescope caught on instead of cinema, which gathered audiences together to watch in the same room? After all, Thomson reasons, the kinetescope was actually the seed of modern television. And though Hollywood seemed spooked by television at first and movie attendance has never recovered, Thomson views the two mediums as close cousins with overlapping interests.

All of Thomson’s historical detail, however, is a platform for his thoughts on the profound effect the movies have had on America’s thinking and behavior — indeed, its very identity. Thomson thinks a frenzied yet ultimately enervating interaction takes place between an audience sitting in a darkened theater and the lit screen. The collision nearly subsumes thought. “Our education is still largely based on what words mean, how they fit together grammatically,” Thomson writes. “Against that, how many of us have ever had any education in the nature of moving imagery, its grammar, its laws or lawlessness, or how the na? viewer is expected to distinguish news from fantasy, art from deception?”

Thomson’s narrative is lit with colorful polemics. Unlike many other historians, he prefers talkies to silent films: “Talkies allowed actors to withdraw into inwardness and silence,” he argues paradoxically. The critic also defends the studio system of the 1930s and ’40s as a relatively sane model for the financing and casting of motion pictures. Thomson’s concise summaries of major figures approach the emblematic: “Chaplin had no education, no intellect perhaps. But he was driven by a brilliant modernism way ahead of Freudian understanding — half narcissism, half utter, cold detachment — that left him as outstanding as Einstein.”

Perhaps most impressively, Thomson punctures the movie industry without making it seem as if his sleek barbs are puncturing an easy target: “The ethos of the stand-out super-hit has taken over from a policy of steady business. That in itself is a mark of how unbusinesslike the business is. …There is material for a very dark comedy now in a United States that provides universal health care in Iraq before it does in its own land. Julia Roberts as the lead doctor? …I regret that America has elected to make films for its bluntest section of society and in ways that flatter them, and we have to recognize how much of that is being done for the money. We have to find another way of measuring ourselves.”

Our passion for the movies may level off over the next hundred years. But if Hollywood continues to inspire books anywhere near as good as this, it could turn us all back into readers.

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share

By: Arts Fuse Editor Filed Under: Books, Film Tagged: Film, hollywood

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Popular Posts

  • Music Feature: The Tedeschi Trucks Band -- Home for the Holidays The Tedeschi Trucks Band is capping another remarkable... posted on December 1, 2019
  • Concert Review: Tool -- Defying Convention Tool is going to remain relevant as long as the band ca... posted on November 15, 2019
  • Rock Concert Review: Bob Dylan at the Tsongas Center -- Nothing if Not Chameleonic But really, what is a Bob Dylan concert these days if n... posted on November 21, 2019
  • Coming Attractions: November 17 through December 6 -- What Will Light Your Fire Arts Fuse critics select the best in film, dance, visua... posted on November 17, 2019
  • Concert Review: Tedeschi Trucks Band -- Even Now, Still Evolving Each concert offered all that the Tedeschi Trucks Band ... posted on December 8, 2019

Social

Follow us:

Follow the Conversation

  • Will McMillan December 11, 2019 at 5:30 pm on Book Review: The ‘Papa’ of Male Modern Dance, Ted Shawn — A Story of Changing NormsGreat to read this review of a new book about Ted Shawn. I will request it from the library. Thank...
  • Peg Aloi December 11, 2019 at 10:01 am on Film Review: “The Wind” — Horror on the PrairieDefinitely vibes of THE WITCH here...also, Loved THE RITUAL!
  • Bill Marx December 11, 2019 at 9:46 am on Film Review: “Dark Waters” — Poison and PassionReading this review reminded me of one of my favorite remarks by Nietzsche: There are no beautiful surfaces without a...
  • Bill Marx December 10, 2019 at 7:50 pm on Book Review: “The Conservative Sensibility” — A Plea for a Return to NormalcyI agree — though I would add that the date on the can has expired.
  • Matthew Hanson December 10, 2019 at 7:11 pm on Book Review: “The Conservative Sensibility” — A Plea for a Return to NormalcyNo doubt that climate change denial is a serious issue, and one that conservatives either laugh off, deny, or obfuscate...

Donate

Like what you see? Donate to The Arts Fuse today!

Footer

  • About Us
  • Advertising/Underwriting
  • Syndication
  • Media Resources
  • Editors and Contributors

We Are

Boston’s online arts magazine since 2007. Powered by 70+ experts and writers.

Follow Us

Monthly Archives

Categories

"Use the point of your pen, not the feather." - Jonathan Swift

Copyright © 2019 · The Arts Fuse - All Rights Reserved · Website by Stephanie Franz